ScholarGate
助手
Process / pipelineobservational research

真实世界证据研究

真实世界证据(RWE)是从真实世界数据(RWD)中获得的临床证据——这些数据是在临床实践中从电子健康记录、保险索赔、患者登记册和其他医疗保健来源常规收集的数据。RWE由美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)于2016年正式确立(Sherman et al.),它解决了关键的差距:随机试验在理想条件下测试药物,而RWE则评估治疗在患有合并症、服用竞争性药物且依从性各异的真实患者中的实际效果。RWE补充(而非取代)试验证据,加速监管决策并支持上市后监测。

在 MethodMind 中打开即将推出Apply, compare, get guidance
Tools & resources
下载幻灯片
Learn & explore
视频即将推出

阅读完整方法

仅限会员

使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。

登录

方法图谱

相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。

来源

  1. Sherman, R. E., Anderson, S. A., Dal Pan, G. J., Gray, G. W., Gross, T., Hunter, N. L., ... & Califf, R. M. (2016). Real-world evidence—what is it and what can it tell us? New England Journal of Medicine, 375(23), 2293–2297. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsb1609216
  2. Levitan, B., Chan, E. W., Doshi, J. A., Hines, P., Komattireddy, H., Sanchez, R., & Sheridan, S. (2018). Collaboration and competition between real-world data and clinical trials. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 52(2), 172–176. link
  3. FDA (2021). Strengthening Our National Strategy on Adaptive Learning Systems for Health Care Quality and Safety: Report to Congress. US Food and Drug Administration. link

如何引用本页

ScholarGate. (2026, June 4). Real-World Evidence (RWE) and Real-World Data (RWD) Collection. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/clinical-research/real-world-evidence

选用哪种方法?

将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。

并排比较

被引用于

ScholarGateReal-World Evidence Studies (Real-World Evidence (RWE) and Real-World Data (RWD) Collection). 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/clinical-research/real-world-evidence · 数据集: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026