Dynamic Panel Models in Politics
Dynamic panel models for political science analyze time-series cross-section (TSCS) data — repeated observations on countries, dyads, states, or other units over many years — where the outcome today depends on its own past. By including a lagged dependent variable alongside unit fixed effects, these models capture persistence and inertia common in comparative politics and international relations, but doing so introduces the Nickell bias. Estimators such as Arellano-Bond and system GMM, and design choices such as Beck-Katz panel-corrected standard errors, were developed to recover credible dynamic estimates from such data.
Les hele metoden
Logg inn med en gratis konto for å lese denne delen.
Metodekart
Nabolaget av beslektede metoder — velg en node for å utforske.
Kilder
- Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634–647. DOI: 10.2307/2082979 ↗
- Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. DOI: 10.2307/2297968 ↗
Slik siterer du denne siden
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Dynamic Panel Models for Political Science (Lagged Dependent Variable Panels). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/no/political-science/dynamic-panel-politics
Hvilken metode?
Sett denne metoden ved siden av sin nærmeste slektning og les dem side om side — biblioteket legger bøkene på bordet; valget er ditt.
- Arellano-Bond GMM-estimatorØkonometri↔ sammenlign
- Dynamisk paneldatamodellØkonometri↔ sammenlign
- PaneldataanalyseØkonometri↔ sammenlign
- System GMM (Arellano-Bover / Blundell-Bond)Økonometri↔ sammenlign
Lignende metoder
Relaterte referansebegreper
Funnet en feil på denne siden? Rapporter eller foreslå en rettelse →