Dynamic Panel Models in Politics
Dynamic panel models for political science analyze time-series cross-section (TSCS) data — repeated observations on countries, dyads, states, or other units over many years — where the outcome today depends on its own past. By including a lagged dependent variable alongside unit fixed effects, these models capture persistence and inertia common in comparative politics and international relations, but doing so introduces the Nickell bias. Estimators such as Arellano-Bond and system GMM, and design choices such as Beck-Katz panel-corrected standard errors, were developed to recover credible dynamic estimates from such data.
Lasīt pilno metodes aprakstu
Piesakieties ar bezmaksas kontu, lai lasītu šo sadaļu.
Metožu karte
Saistīto metožu apkaime — atlasiet mezglu, lai izpētītu.
Avoti
- Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634–647. DOI: 10.2307/2082979 ↗
- Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. DOI: 10.2307/2297968 ↗
Kā citēt šo lapu
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Dynamic Panel Models for Political Science (Lagged Dependent Variable Panels). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/lv/political-science/dynamic-panel-politics
Kura metode?
Novietojiet šo metodi blakus tās tuvākajām radniecīgajām metodēm un lasiet tās līdzās — bibliotēka noliek grāmatas uz galda; izvēle ir jūsu.
- Arellano-Bond GMM novērtētājsEkonometrija↔ salīdzināt
- Dinamiskais paneļa datu modelisEkonometrija↔ salīdzināt
- Panel Data AnalysisEkonometrija↔ salīdzināt
- System GMM (Arellano-Bover / Blundell-Bond)Ekonometrija↔ salīdzināt
Līdzīgas metodes
Saistītie atsauces jēdzieni
Pamanījāt kļūdu šajā lapā? Ziņojiet vai ierosiniet labojumu →