Scenario Axes Method
The scenario axes method is the deductive, double-uncertainty technique at the heart of much modern scenario planning: take the two driving forces that matter most and are least predictable, cross them as orthogonal axes, and develop the four resulting quadrants into distinct, internally consistent scenarios. Paul Schoemaker's 1995 account of scenario planning as a tool for strategic thinking established the logic of building scenarios from a small set of critical uncertainties, and Bishop, Hines and Collins's survey of scenario techniques names the 2x2 axes approach as the most widely used deductive method. Its appeal is structural clarity: by reducing a tangle of forces to two key uncertainties and a clean matrix, it produces a manageable, memorable set of four contrasting futures that span the most important dimensions of uncertainty. Treated here as a standalone scenario-construction device, the method is prized for turning the open-ended art of scenario building into a disciplined, repeatable procedure.
阅读完整方法
使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
方法图谱
相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。
来源
- Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1995). Scenario planning: A tool for strategic thinking. Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 25-40. link ↗
- Bishop, P., Hines, A., & Collins, T. (2007). The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques. Foresight, 9(1), 5-25. DOI: 10.1108/14636680710727516 ↗
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Scenario Axes Method (2x2 Deductive Double-Uncertainty Scenario Construction). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/futures-foresight-studies/scenario-axes-method
选用哪种方法?
将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。
- Cross-Impact Balance AnalysisFutures Foresight Studies↔ 比较
- Intuitive Logics Scenario PlanningFutures Foresight Studies↔ 比较
- Normative Scenario BackcastingFutures Foresight Studies↔ 比较
- Three Horizons FrameworkFutures Foresight Studies↔ 比较