Normative Scenario Backcasting
Normative scenario backcasting inverts the usual direction of futures work: instead of projecting forward from the present to ask what is likely, it starts from an explicit image of a desired future and works backward to construct the path of milestones, conditions, and actions that would lead there. John Robinson introduced the approach in 1990 as a method for people who 'hate to predict,' arguing that when the goal is to assess whether and how a normatively preferred future could be reached, forecasting the probable is the wrong tool. Backcasting instead asks what would have to happen, in what order, for the desired endpoint to come about. Distinct from generic policy backcasting, the normative scenario variant centres on first articulating a rich, value-laden scenario image of the endpoint and then deriving the pathway from it. As Bishop, Hines and Collins note in their survey of scenario techniques, this goal-driven logic makes backcasting a natural partner to scenario methods wherever the aim is not to anticipate the future but to deliberately work toward a chosen one.
阅读完整方法
使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
方法图谱
相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。
来源
- Robinson, J. B. (1990). Futures under glass: A recipe for people who hate to predict. Futures, 22(8), 820-842. DOI: 10.1016/0016-3287(90)90018-D ↗
- Bishop, P., Hines, A., & Collins, T. (2007). The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques. Foresight, 9(1), 5-25. DOI: 10.1108/14636680710727516 ↗
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Normative Scenario Backcasting (Desired Endpoint Image to Milestone Pathway Construction). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/futures-foresight-studies/normative-scenario-backcasting
选用哪种方法?
将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。
- Causal Layered AnalysisFutures Foresight Studies↔ 比较
- Intuitive Logics Scenario PlanningFutures Foresight Studies↔ 比较
- Scenario Axes MethodFutures Foresight Studies↔ 比较
- Three Horizons FrameworkFutures Foresight Studies↔ 比较