Dator's Four Futures Archetypes
Dator's Four Futures Archetypes is a deductive, template-driven approach to scenario construction in which four generic story-shapes — continuation (continued growth), collapse, discipline, and transformation — are used as ready-made skeletons onto which the specifics of a given domain are mapped. Where inductive scenario methods build narratives bottom-up from combinations of driving forces, the archetype method starts top-down from Jim Dator's empirically distilled typology of generic futures and asks what each archetype would look like for this particular question. Bishop, Hines and Collins, in their 2007 review of scenario techniques, classify this as one of the principal scenario-development families, valued because the archetypes guarantee a divergent, comprehensible set without the combinatorial explosion of fully inductive methods. The output is a small, contrasting suite of scenarios that share a common, recognizable logic.
阅读完整方法
使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
方法图谱
相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。
来源
- Dator, J. (2009). Alternative futures at the Manoa School. Journal of Futures Studies, 14(2), 1-18. link ↗
- Bishop, P., Hines, A., & Collins, T. (2007). The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques. Foresight, 9(1), 5-25. DOI: 10.1108/14636680710727516 ↗
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Dator's Four Futures Archetypes (Archetype-Based Scenario Construction). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/futures-foresight-studies/dator-scenario-archetypes
选用哪种方法?
将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。
- Causal Layered AnalysisFutures Foresight Studies↔ 比较
- Intuitive Logics Scenario PlanningFutures Foresight Studies↔ 比较
- Manoa Alternative Futures MethodFutures Foresight Studies↔ 比较
- Three Horizons FrameworkFutures Foresight Studies↔ 比较