Three-Component Model of Organizational Commitment
The Three-Component Model (TCM) of organizational commitment, developed by John Meyer and Natalie Allen, is the dominant framework for understanding why employees stay with and bind themselves to their organizations. Its central claim is that commitment is not one thing but three distinguishable psychological states: affective commitment (an emotional desire to stay — you want to), continuance commitment (the perceived cost of leaving — you need to), and normative commitment (a felt obligation — you ought to). Each is measured by its own subscale and arises from different antecedents, and although all three reduce turnover, they relate very differently to performance, citizenship, and well-being. Allen and Meyer's 1991 paper laid out the conceptualization, and Meyer, Stanley, Herscovitch, and Topolnytsky's 2002 meta-analysis confirmed that the components are distinguishable and have systematically different correlates and consequences.
Läs hela metoden
Logga in med ett kostnadsfritt konto för att läsa avsnittet.
Metodkarta
Närområdet av besläktade metoder — välj en nod för att utforska.
Källor
- Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89. DOI: 10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z ↗
- Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20-52. DOI: 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842 ↗
Så citerar du den här sidan
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Three-Component Model of Organizational Commitment (Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/sv/organizational-behavior/organizational-commitment-tcm
Vilken metod?
Placera den här metoden bredvid sina närmaste släktingar och läs dem sida vid sida — biblioteket lägger fram böckerna på bordet; valet är ditt.
- Job Demands-Resources ModelOrganisationsbeteende↔ jämför
- Perceived Organizational Support ScaleOrganisationsbeteende↔ jämför
- Utrecht Work Engagement ScaleSocialpsykologi↔ jämför
Refereras av
Liknande metoder
Hittade du ett fel på sidan? Rapportera eller föreslå en rättelse →