Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Policy
Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is an economic evaluation that compares competing policies or programs by their cost relative to a single, common measure of effect — lives saved, cases averted, years of education gained, or quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Rather than valuing outcomes in money, CEA expresses results as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER): the extra cost of one option per extra unit of outcome it delivers compared with the next-best alternative. Codified in standard references such as Drummond and colleagues' Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes and the US Panel's Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine, CEA is the dominant appraisal tool for health and increasingly for other public programs with a shared outcome metric.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Claxton, K., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W. (2015). Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199665877
- Gold, M. R., Siegel, J. E., Russell, L. B., & Weinstein, M. C. (Eds.) (1996). Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780195108248
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Policy and Program Evaluation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/public-policy/cost-effectiveness-analysis-policy
どの手法を選ぶ?
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- Benefit-Cost Analysis for PolicyPublic Policy↔ 比較
- 費用対効果分析 (CEA)医療経済学↔ 比較
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in HTA医療経営学↔ 比較
- Multi-Criteria Policy AnalysisPublic Policy↔ 比較