ScholarGate
助手
Regression modelCausal inference / quasi-experiment

Regression Discontinuity in Policy Evaluation

Regression discontinuity (RD) is a quasi-experimental design for estimating the causal effect of a policy that is assigned by a sharp threshold on some continuous eligibility score — an income line for a benefit, a test score for a scholarship, a vote share for winning office, a population cutoff that triggers a regulation. Units falling just below and just above the cutoff are nearly identical except for their treatment status, so comparing their outcomes isolates the policy's effect at the threshold. First used by Thistlethwaite and Campbell in 1960 and revived as a workhorse of policy evaluation by economists in the 2000s, RD is widely regarded as the quasi-experimental design with the strongest claim to internal validity.

在 MethodMind 中打开即将推出应用、比较、获取指导
工具与资源
下载幻灯片
学习与探索
视频即将推出

阅读完整方法

仅限会员

使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。

登录

方法图谱

相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。

来源

  1. Thistlethwaite, D. L., & Campbell, D. T. (1960). Regression-discontinuity analysis: An alternative to the ex post facto experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(6), 309–317. DOI: 10.1037/h0044319
  2. Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615–635. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.001
  3. Lee, D. S., & Lemieux, T. (2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 281–355. DOI: 10.1257/jel.48.2.281

如何引用本页

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Regression Discontinuity Design for Policy Evaluation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/public-policy/regression-discontinuity-policy

选用哪种方法?

将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。

并排比较

被引用于

ScholarGateRegression Discontinuity in Policy Evaluation (Regression Discontinuity Design for Policy Evaluation). 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/public-policy/regression-discontinuity-policy · 数据集: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026