ScholarGate
助手
Regression modelQuasi-experimental / causal inference

政策评估双重差分法

政策评估双重差分法(DiD)专门用于评估政府项目、法规或政策改革的因果效应。它比较了受政策影响的群体与可比的未受影响群体在政策实施前后的结果变化,从而将政策的净效应与预先存在的趋势和同期共有的冲击区分开来。

在 MethodMind 中打开即将推出视频即将推出Download slides

阅读完整方法

仅限会员

使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。

登录

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

来源

  1. Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1), 5-86. DOI: 10.1257/jel.47.1.5
  2. Heckman, J. J., LaLonde, R. J., & Smith, J. A. (1999). The Economics and Econometrics of Active Labor Market Programs. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3A (pp. 1865-2097). Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/S1573-4463(99)03012-6

如何引用本页

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Difference-in-Differences for Policy Evaluation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/causal-inference/policy-evaluation-difference-in-differences

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

Compare side by side

被引用于

ScholarGatePolicy Evaluation Difference-in-Differences (Difference-in-Differences for Policy Evaluation). 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/causal-inference/policy-evaluation-difference-in-differences · 数据集: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026