Process / pipelinePolitical cognition
Motivated Reasoning Experiment
A motivated reasoning experiment tests whether people process political information to reach conclusions they are directionally motivated to hold rather than the most accurate ones. Building on Kunda's (1990) theory and crystallized by Taber and Lodge (2006), these designs expose partisans to attitude-congruent and incongruent arguments and measure biased assimilation, disconfirmation bias, attitude polarization, and selective exposure.
在 MethodMind 中打开即将推出应用、比较、获取指导
工具与资源
学习与探索
视频即将推出
阅读完整方法
仅限会员
登录使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
方法图谱
相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。
来源
- Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x ↗
- Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480-498. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 ↗
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Motivated Political Reasoning Experiment. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/political-psychology/motivated-reasoning-experiment
选用哪种方法？
将本方法与其最相近的同类并置，并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上，取舍则由您定夺。
- Affective Polarization Measurement政治心理学↔ 比较
- Issue Framing Experiment政治心理学↔ 比较
- Need for Closure Scale政治心理学↔ 比较
- 党派认同量表政治心理学↔ 比较