Process / pipelinePolarization
Affective Polarization Measurement
Affective polarization measurement quantifies the gap between how positively people feel toward their own political party (the in-party) and how negatively they feel toward the opposing party (the out-party). Iyengar, Sood and Lelkes (2012) showed that this affective divide has grown sharply even where issue positions have not, reframing polarization as a social-identity phenomenon of partisan like and dislike rather than ideological distance.
在 MethodMind 中打开即将推出应用、比较、获取指导
工具与资源
学习与探索
视频即将推出
阅读完整方法
仅限会员
登录使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
方法图谱
相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。
来源
- Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405-431. DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfs038 ↗
- Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 129-146. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034 ↗
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Affective Polarization Measurement. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/political-psychology/affective-polarization-measurement
选用哪种方法？
将本方法与其最相近的同类并置，并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上，取舍则由您定夺。
- Feeling Thermometer Analysis政治心理学↔ 比较
- 党派认同量表政治心理学↔ 比较
- 政治意识形态量表政治心理学↔ 比较
- Social Identity Political Measurement政治心理学↔ 比较