Social Identity Political Measurement
Social identity measurement in political behavior applies social identity theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) to political groups, treating partisanship, ideology, or movement membership as a social identity rather than a mere instrumental affiliation. Huddy, Mason and Aaroe (2015) adapted Mael and Tetlock-style identity items into a partisan social-identity scale that measures expressive, emotionally charged group attachment and predicts campaign activity and political emotion better than issue agreement.
阅读完整方法
使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
方法图谱
相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。
来源
- Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aaroe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1-17. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055414000604 ↗
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. ISBN: 9780818502781
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Social Identity Measurement in Political Behavior. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/political-psychology/social-identity-political-measurement
选用哪种方法？
将本方法与其最相近的同类并置，并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上，取舍则由您定夺。
- Affective Polarization Measurement政治心理学↔ 比较
- Group Identity Measurement政治心理学↔ 比较
- 国家认同量表政治心理学↔ 比较
- 党派认同量表政治心理学↔ 比较