ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Motivated Reasoning Experiment×党派认同量表×
领域政治心理学政治心理学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20061960
提出者Charles Taber & Milton LodgeAngus Campbell et al.
类型Survey/lab experimentSelf-report
开创性文献Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769. DOI ↗Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons. link ↗
别名Directional Motivated Reasoning Study, Biased Assimilation Experiment, Disconfirmation Bias ParadigmPAS, Party Identification, Partisan Strength
相关43
摘要A motivated reasoning experiment tests whether people process political information to reach conclusions they are directionally motivated to hold rather than the most accurate ones. Building on Kunda's (1990) theory and crystallized by Taber and Lodge (2006), these designs expose partisans to attitude-congruent and incongruent arguments and measure biased assimilation, disconfirmation bias, attitude polarization, and selective exposure.The Partisan Identity Scale measures strength and direction of psychological attachment to a political party, encompassing both party preference and emotional party identification. Foundational since Campbell et al.'s American Voter (1960), the measure distinguishes party affiliation (which party one is registered with) from party identification (psychological identity with a party as a social group). Partisan identity is among the strongest predictors of voting behavior, political attitudes, and interpretation of political information, functioning as a 'perceptual filter' through which voters process news.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Motivated Reasoning Experiment · Partisan Identity Scale. 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare