Elite Cue Experiment
An elite cue experiment isolates the persuasive power of source endorsements by holding a policy message constant and randomly varying who is said to support it. Grounded in John Zaller's receive-accept-sample model of mass opinion, which holds that citizens take cues from trusted political elites rather than reasoning from first principles, the design reveals how much opinion moves simply because a party or leader takes a side. Stephen Nicholson's work on polarizing cues shows that in-party endorsements can persuade while out-party endorsements provoke backlash, making the cue, not the argument, the engine of opinion change.
阅读完整方法
使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
方法图谱
相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。
来源
- Zaller, J. R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521407861
- Nicholson, S. P. (2012). Polarizing Cues. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 52-66. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00541.x ↗
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Elite Cue Experiment (Party-Endorsement Persuasion Design). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/political-psychology/elite-cue-experiment
选用哪种方法?
将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。
- Democratic Norms Support Measurement政治心理学↔ 比较
- Issue Framing Experiment政治心理学↔ 比较
- Partisan Motivated Reasoning Paradigm政治心理学↔ 比较