Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire
The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) is the standard instrument for measuring the full-range leadership model, which spans laissez-faire (non-) leadership, transactional leadership, and transformational leadership. Building on James MacGregor Burns's distinction, Bernard Bass's 1985 book reframed transformational leadership as leaders who raise followers' aspirations and move them to perform beyond expectations, and operationalized it through the MLQ. The transformational factors are idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration; the transactional factors are contingent reward and management-by-exception; and laissez-faire represents the absence of leadership. The current MLQ-5X measures these as distinct factors rated by followers and self. Judge and Piccolo's 2004 meta-analysis established the criterion validity of the model, showing strong overall validity for transformational leadership and a substantial positive role for contingent reward.
Lees de volledige methode
Log in met een gratis account om dit onderdeel te lezen.
Methodenkaart
De omgeving van verwante methoden — selecteer een knooppunt om te verkennen.
Bronnen
- Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: Free Press. ISBN: 9780029018101
- Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755-768. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755 ↗
Deze pagina citeren
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (Full-Range Leadership Model). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/nl/organizational-behavior/multifactor-leadership-questionnaire
Welke methode?
Plaats deze methode naast haar naaste verwanten en lees ze naast elkaar — de bibliotheek legt de boeken op tafel; de keuze is aan u.
- Organizational Citizenship Behavior ScaleOrganisatiegedrag↔ vergelijken
- Team Psychological Safety MeasurementOrganisatiegedrag↔ vergelijken
- Utrecht Work Engagement ScaleSociale psychologie↔ vergelijken
Geciteerd door
Vergelijkbare methoden
Een fout op deze pagina gezien? Meld het of stel een correctie voor →