Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Causal inference›Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD)
Regression model

Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD)

Regression Discontinuity Design · Also known as: RDD, regression discontinuity design, sharp RDD, fuzzy RDD, Regresyon Süreksizliği (RDD)

Regression Discontinuity Design is a quasi-experimental method that identifies a causal effect by locally comparing units just above and just below a cutoff on a continuous assignment (running) variable. Formalised for applied work by Imbens and Lemieux (2008) and developed as a practical framework by Cattaneo, Idrobo, and Titiunik (2020), it estimates a local average treatment effect (LATE) at the threshold.

ScholarGate
  1. Regression model
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Regression Discontinuity
Interrupted Time SeriesMatching MethodsOLS RegressionPropensity Score MatchingTwo-Stage Least Squares…Conditional Process Anal…Difference-in-Discontinu…Event Study DesignFrontdoor AdjustmentHeterogeneous Treatment…

+17 more

When to use it

Use RDD when treatment is assigned by a known rule that crosses a sharp cutoff on a continuous running variable, and you have a reasonably large sample (at least about 200 observations, with enough mass near the threshold). It relies on units being unable to precisely manipulate the running variable around the cutoff (checked with a McCrary density test) and on potential outcomes being continuous in the running variable at the threshold. Prefer local linear or low-order polynomial fits with an MSE-optimal bandwidth; global high-order polynomials are discouraged. It is less suitable for small samples or when individuals can sort themselves across the cutoff.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Delivers a transparent, credible causal estimate near the cutoff under weak, partly testable assumptions.
  • Manipulation can be probed directly with the McCrary density test, and the design can be visualised with a clear discontinuity plot.
  • Approximates a local randomised experiment: units just above and just below the threshold are comparable by construction.
Limitations
  • Identifies only a local average treatment effect (LATE) at the cutoff, which may not generalise to units far from the threshold.
  • Needs a large sample with enough observations near the cutoff; with n below about 200 the bandwidth becomes too narrow and the estimate unreliable.
  • If units can precisely manipulate the running variable to land on the favourable side, the identification strategy breaks down entirely.

Frequently asked

What is the difference between sharp and fuzzy RDD?

In a sharp design crossing the cutoff perfectly determines treatment, so everyone above the threshold is treated. In a fuzzy design crossing the cutoff only changes the probability of treatment; the discontinuity in treatment take-up is then used as an instrument to recover the effect.

Why does the McCrary test matter?

RDD assumes units cannot precisely manipulate the running variable to land on the favourable side of the cutoff. The McCrary density test checks for a jump in the density of the running variable at the threshold; a significant jump signals sorting and invalidates the design.

How is the bandwidth chosen?

The estimate uses only observations near the cutoff, and the bandwidth sets how near. It should be picked with an MSE-optimal selector rather than by eye, balancing the bias from including far-away points against the variance from using too few observations.

Does RDD give an effect for everyone?

No. RDD identifies a local average treatment effect at the cutoff. It is most informative about units near the threshold and may not generalise to those far above or below it.

Sources

  1. Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615-635. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.001 ↗
  2. Cattaneo, M. D., Idrobo, N., & Titiunik, R. (2020). A Practical Introduction to Regression Discontinuity Designs: Foundations. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-1108710206

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 1). Regression Discontinuity Design. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/causal-inference/regression-discontinuity

Related methods

Interrupted Time SeriesMatching MethodsOLS RegressionPropensity Score MatchingTwo-Stage Least Squares (2SLS)

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Interrupted Time SeriesCausal inference↔ compare
  • Matching MethodsCausal inference↔ compare
  • OLS RegressionEconometrics↔ compare
  • Propensity Score MatchingResearch Statistics↔ compare
  • Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS)Causal inference↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Conditional Process AnalysisDifference-in-DiscontinuitiesEvent Study DesignFrontdoor AdjustmentHeterogeneous Treatment EffectsInterrupted Time SeriesInverse Probability Weighting in Education ResearchLocal Average Treatment EffectMachine Learning-Augmented Sensitivity Analysis for CausalityMarginal structural model in education researchMendelian RandomizationPlacebo TestsPolicy Evaluation Event Study DesignPolicy Evaluation Matching EstimatorPolicy Evaluation Panel Event StudyPropensity Score Weighting in Education ResearchRegression Discontinuity in ElectionsRegression Discontinuity in SentencingRegression Kink DesignSensitivity analysis for causality in education researchShift-Share IVStaggered Difference-in-DifferencesSynthetic Control

Similar methods

Regression Discontinuity DesignFuzzy Regression DiscontinuityRegression Discontinuity in Policy EvaluationPolicy Evaluation Regression Discontinuity DesignPolicy Evaluation Fuzzy Regression DiscontinuityRobust Fuzzy Regression DiscontinuityRegression discontinuity design in education researchMachine learning-augmented regression discontinuity design

Related reference concepts

Quasi-Experimental and Natural Experiment DesignNatural ExperimentCounterfactual ReasoningDesign of ExperimentsSingle Equation Models • Single VariablesSensitivity Analysis

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Regression Discontinuity (Regression Discontinuity Design). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/causal-inference/regression-discontinuity · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Imbens & Lemieux (guide to practice); Cattaneo, Idrobo & Titiunik (practical introduction)
Year
2008
Type
Quasi-experimental causal design
Estimate
Local average treatment effect (LATE) at the cutoff
Design
Sharp or fuzzy discontinuity in a running variable
MinSample
200
Related methods
Interrupted Time SeriesMatching MethodsOLS RegressionPropensity Score MatchingTwo-Stage Least Squares (2SLS)
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account