Regression Discontinuity in Policy Evaluation
Regression discontinuity (RD) is a quasi-experimental design for estimating the causal effect of a policy that is assigned by a sharp threshold on some continuous eligibility score — an income line for a benefit, a test score for a scholarship, a vote share for winning office, a population cutoff that triggers a regulation. Units falling just below and just above the cutoff are nearly identical except for their treatment status, so comparing their outcomes isolates the policy's effect at the threshold. First used by Thistlethwaite and Campbell in 1960 and revived as a workhorse of policy evaluation by economists in the 2000s, RD is widely regarded as the quasi-experimental design with the strongest claim to internal validity.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
Sources
- Thistlethwaite, D. L., & Campbell, D. T. (1960). Regression-discontinuity analysis: An alternative to the ex post facto experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(6), 309–317. DOI: 10.1037/h0044319 ↗
- Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615–635. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.001 ↗
- Lee, D. S., & Lemieux, T. (2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 281–355. DOI: 10.1257/jel.48.2.281 ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Regression Discontinuity Design for Policy Evaluation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/public-policy/regression-discontinuity-policy
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Policy Evaluation Difference-in-DifferencesCausal inference↔ compare
- Policy Evaluation Interrupted Time SeriesCausal inference↔ compare
- Policy Evaluation Regression Discontinuity DesignCausal inference↔ compare