Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Econometrics›Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD)
Regression model

Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD)

Also known as: RDD, regression discontinuity, sharp regression discontinuity, Regresyon Süreksizliği Tasarımı (RDD)

Regression Discontinuity Design is a quasi-experimental method that estimates a local causal effect around a threshold (cutoff) value, comparing units just below and just above the cutoff as if they were almost randomly assigned. It is the design developed for applied practice by Imbens and Lemieux (2008) and by Lee and Lemieux (2010).

ScholarGate
  1. Regression model
  2. v1
  3. 3 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Regression Discontinuity Design
Difference-in-DifferencesInstrumental Variables i…OLS RegressionPanel Fixed EffectsPropensity Score Matching

When to use it

Use RDD when assignment to treatment is governed by a genuine, non-manipulable threshold on a continuous running variable, and you have enough observations clustered around that cutoff (typically at least about 100, with adequate density near the threshold). It fits cross-sectional and panel data with continuous or binary outcomes. The design is credible only when units cannot precisely control which side of the cutoff they fall on, when unobserved characteristics evolve smoothly through the cutoff, and when the bandwidth is chosen by a principled rule rather than by hand.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Delivers a credible causal effect from observational data by exploiting a natural, rule-based cutoff, with weaker assumptions than most matching designs.
  • Comparing units just on either side of the threshold mimics random assignment locally, so the local effect is transparent and easy to defend.
  • The discontinuity can be inspected visually, making the identifying assumption unusually intuitive to communicate.
Limitations
  • Estimates a local effect at the cutoff only; it does not generalise to units far from the threshold.
  • Requires enough observations densely packed around the cutoff, so the effective sample for estimation can be small even in a large dataset.
  • If individuals can manipulate the running variable to cross the cutoff, the design breaks down and the effect is biased.
  • Results are sensitive to the chosen bandwidth and to the order of the local polynomial.

Frequently asked

What is the running variable in RDD?

It is the continuous variable that determines treatment assignment, such as a test score, income, or age. Treatment switches on the moment this variable crosses the cutoff, and the design compares outcomes just below and just above that point.

Why do I need the McCrary density test?

RDD assumes individuals cannot precisely manipulate the running variable to land on the favourable side of the cutoff. The McCrary test checks for bunching just above or below the threshold; a sharp jump in density signals manipulation and threatens the design's validity.

How is the bandwidth chosen?

The bandwidth sets how wide a window around the cutoff is used for estimation. It should be selected with a data-driven rule such as the IK or CCT method rather than by hand, because the estimate is sensitive to this choice.

Does RDD give an effect for everyone?

No. RDD identifies a local effect at the cutoff for units near the threshold. It does not tell you what the treatment would do for units far from the cutoff, so the estimate should not be extrapolated to the whole population.

Sources

  1. Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615-635. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.001 ↗
  2. Cattaneo, M. D., Idrobo, N., & Titiunik, R. (2020). A Practical Introduction to Regression Discontinuity Designs: Foundations. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108684606 ↗
  3. Lee, D. S., & Lemieux, T. (2010). Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 281-355. DOI: 10.1257/jel.48.2.281 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 1). Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/econometrics/rdd

Related methods

Difference-in-DifferencesInstrumental Variables in Health ResearchOLS RegressionPanel Fixed EffectsPropensity Score Matching

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Difference-in-DifferencesEconometrics↔ compare
  • Instrumental Variables in Health ResearchHealth Economics↔ compare
  • OLS RegressionEconometrics↔ compare
  • Panel Fixed EffectsEconometrics↔ compare
  • Propensity Score MatchingResearch Statistics↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

Regression DiscontinuityRegression Discontinuity in Policy EvaluationPolicy Evaluation Regression Discontinuity DesignRegression discontinuity design in education researchFuzzy Regression DiscontinuityPanel Data Regression Discontinuity DesignRobust Regression Discontinuity DesignMachine learning-augmented regression discontinuity design

Related reference concepts

Quasi-Experimental and Natural Experiment DesignNatural ExperimentDesign of ExperimentsCounterfactual ReasoningSingle Equation Models • Single VariablesSensitivity Analysis

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Regression Discontinuity Design (Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD)). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/econometrics/rdd · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Imbens & Lemieux; Lee & Lemieux (modern practice); Cattaneo, Idrobo & Titiunik
Year
2008
Type
Quasi-experimental causal design
Estimator
Local treatment effect at the cutoff (local polynomial regression)
Outcome
continuous or binary
MinSample
100
Related methods
Difference-in-DifferencesInstrumental Variables in Health ResearchOLS RegressionPanel Fixed EffectsPropensity Score Matching
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account