Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Causal inference›Local Average Treatment Effect (LATE / CACE)
Regression model

Local Average Treatment Effect (LATE / CACE)

Local Average Treatment Effect (LATE / Complier Average Causal Effect) · Also known as: LATE, CACE, complier average causal effect, Yerel Ortalama Tedavi Etkisi (LATE / CACE)

The Local Average Treatment Effect is an instrumental-variable estimand, introduced by Imbens and Angrist (1994) and formalised with Rubin (1996), that recovers the average treatment effect for the subpopulation of compliers — units whose treatment status is actually moved by the instrument. It is closely tied to compliance analysis.

ScholarGate
  1. Regression model
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Local Average Treatment Effect
Frontdoor AdjustmentHeterogeneous Treatment…Propensity Score MatchingRegression DiscontinuityTwo-Stage Least Squares…Bayesian Fuzzy Regressio…Bayesian Regression Disc…Fuzzy Regression Discont…Fuzzy Regression Discont…Heterogeneous Treatment…

+7 more

When to use it

Use LATE when treatment is not fully under the analyst's control but a valid instrument shifts take-up, and you need a credible causal effect from observational or imperfect-compliance data. It requires a valid instrument (relevant, exogenous, exclusion restriction), monotonicity (the instrument moves treatment in one direction, with no defiers), and a reasonable sample (at least about 100 observations so the complier subgroup is well populated). The estimate is local: it applies only to compliers, not to always-takers or never-takers.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Delivers a credible causal effect even when treatment take-up is imperfect, as in encouragement designs and randomised offers.
  • Has a transparent interpretation: it is the intent-to-treat effect rescaled by the compliance rate.
  • Relies only on instrument validity and monotonicity rather than on selection-on-observables, making it robust to unobserved confounding.
Limitations
  • The effect is local to the complier subpopulation and does not generalise to always-takers, never-takers, or the full population.
  • In small samples (n < 100) the complier subgroup is thin, so the LATE estimate has very wide confidence intervals.
  • A violation of monotonicity mixes compliers and defiers, after which the estimand can no longer be interpreted cleanly.

Frequently asked

What exactly is a complier?

A complier is a unit that takes the treatment when the instrument pushes toward it and does not take it when the instrument pushes away. LATE measures the average effect for this group only, in contrast to always-takers and never-takers whose behaviour the instrument does not change.

How does LATE relate to the intent-to-treat (ITT) effect?

LATE equals the ITT effect — the instrument's effect on the outcome — divided by the compliance rate, which is the instrument's effect on treatment take-up. Rescaling the ITT by the share of compliers converts the effect of being offered treatment into the effect of actually receiving it.

Why is the monotonicity assumption so important?

Monotonicity says the instrument moves everyone's treatment in the same direction, ruling out defiers. Without it, compliers and defiers mix and the instrumental-variable estimate no longer corresponds to a clean average effect for any single, interpretable group.

When should I prefer matching or plain 2SLS instead?

If your instrument is too weak or monotonicity fails, propensity score matching under selection-on-observables may be more defensible. In small samples where the complier subgroup is sparse, a standard 2SLS instrumental-variable estimate is the natural fallback.

Sources

  1. Imbens, G. W., & Angrist, J. D. (1994). Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 62(2), 467-475. DOI: 10.2307/2951620 ↗
  2. Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1996). Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(434), 444-455. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1996.10476902 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 1). Local Average Treatment Effect (LATE / Complier Average Causal Effect). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/causal-inference/local-average-treatment-effect

Related methods

Frontdoor AdjustmentHeterogeneous Treatment EffectsPropensity Score MatchingRegression DiscontinuityTwo-Stage Least Squares (2SLS)

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Frontdoor AdjustmentCausal inference↔ compare
  • Heterogeneous Treatment EffectsCausal inference↔ compare
  • Propensity Score MatchingResearch Statistics↔ compare
  • Regression DiscontinuityCausal inference↔ compare
  • Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS)Causal inference↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Bayesian Fuzzy Regression DiscontinuityBayesian Regression Discontinuity DesignFuzzy Regression DiscontinuityFuzzy Regression Discontinuity in Education ResearchHeterogeneous Treatment Effect Fuzzy Regression DiscontinuityHeterogeneous treatment effect Instrumental variablesHeterogeneous Treatment Effect Regression Discontinuity DesignInstrumental Variables in Education ResearchMatching MethodsPolicy Evaluation Instrumental VariablesRobust Fuzzy Regression DiscontinuitySensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured ConfoundingTwo-Stage Least Squares (2SLS)

Similar methods

Heterogeneous treatment effect Instrumental variablesPolicy Evaluation Instrumental VariablesInstrumental Variables in Health ResearchFuzzy Regression DiscontinuityInstrumental Variables in Education ResearchHeterogeneous Treatment Effect Matching EstimatorCounterfactual Impact EvaluationRegression Discontinuity

Related reference concepts

Counterfactual ReasoningCausal IdentificationCausal InferenceSensitivity AnalysisInstrumental Variables (IV) EstimationInstrumental Variables (IV) Estimation

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Local Average Treatment Effect (Local Average Treatment Effect (LATE / Complier Average Causal Effect)). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/causal-inference/local-average-treatment-effect · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Imbens & Angrist (1994); Angrist, Imbens & Rubin (1996)
Year
1994
Type
Instrumental-variable causal estimand
Estimator
Two-stage least squares (2SLS / Wald ratio)
Estimand
Treatment effect for compliers only
Outcome
continuous or binary
MinSample
100
Related methods
Frontdoor AdjustmentHeterogeneous Treatment EffectsPropensity Score MatchingRegression DiscontinuityTwo-Stage Least Squares (2SLS)
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account