Comparative Historical Analysis
Comparative historical analysis (CHA) is a macro-causal research tradition that explains large-scale outcomes — revolutions, regime change, welfare states, development paths — by systematically comparing a small number of cases reconstructed in depth across historical time. It combines cross-case comparison with close attention to temporality: sequences, timing, critical junctures, and path dependence. Associated with Barrington Moore, Theda Skocpol, and codified by Mahoney and Rueschemeyer, CHA treats history not as background but as the medium through which causes operate.
阅读完整方法
使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
方法图谱
相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。
来源
- Mahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (Eds.) (2003). Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521016452
- Skocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521294997
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Comparative Historical Analysis (Macro-Causal Comparison of Cases over Time). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/political-science/comparative-historical-analysis
选用哪种方法?
将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。
- Most Different Systems DesignPolitical Science↔ 比较
- Most Similar Systems DesignPolitical Science↔ 比较
- 过程追踪心理测量学↔ 比较
- Qualitative Comparative AnalysisPolitical Science↔ 比较