Process / pipelineClinical / epidemiology
Meta-analytic competing risks analysis — Pooling Competing Risks Evidence Across Studies
Meta-analytic competing risks analysis pools results from multiple primary studies that each used a competing risks framework, allowing summary estimates of cause-specific or subdistribution hazard ratios and cumulative incidence functions. Because standard meta-analytic methods may misrepresent competing events, specialized pooling strategies are required that respect the subdistribution hazard structure introduced by Fine and Gray and the distinction between cause-specific and all-cause hazard models.
阅读完整方法
仅限会员
登录使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
方法图谱
相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。
来源
- Riley, R. D., Hayden, J. A., Steyerberg, E. W., et al. (2013). Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: Prognostic Factor Research. PLOS Medicine, 10(2), e1001380. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001380 ↗
- Wolkewitz, M., Cooper, B. S., Bonten, M. J., Barnett, A. G., & Schumacher, M. (2014). Interpreting and comparing risks in the presence of competing events. BMJ, 349, g5060. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g5060 ↗
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Meta-Analysis of Competing Risks Studies. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/epidemiology/meta-analytic-competing-risks-analysis
选用哪种方法?
将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。
- Cox比例风险模型流行病学↔ 比较
- Fine-Gray 竞争风险模型统计学↔ 比较
- Kaplan-Meier分析流行病学↔ 比较
- 荟萃分析队列研究流行病学↔ 比较
- Meta-analytic Survival Analysis流行病学↔ 比较