ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Meta-analytic competing risks analysis×Fine-Gray 竞争风险模型×
领域流行病学统计学
方法族Process / pipelineHypothesis test
起源年份2000s–2010s (formalized as a pooled approach)1999
提出者Based on Fine & Gray (1999) competing risks framework; meta-analytic synthesis methods established through methodological literature (mid-2000s onward)Jason P. Fine & Robert J. Gray
类型Systematic review / meta-analysisSubdistribution hazard regression
开创性文献Riley, R. D., Hayden, J. A., Steyerberg, E. W., et al. (2013). Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: Prognostic Factor Research. PLOS Medicine, 10(2), e1001380. DOI ↗Fine, J.P. & Gray, R.J. (1999). A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 496–509. DOI ↗
别名meta-analysis of competing risks, pooled competing risks analysis, systematic review competing riskscompeting risks regression, subdistribution hazard model, Fine-Gray model, Fine-Gray Competing Risks Modeli
相关55
摘要Meta-analytic competing risks analysis pools results from multiple primary studies that each used a competing risks framework, allowing summary estimates of cause-specific or subdistribution hazard ratios and cumulative incidence functions. Because standard meta-analytic methods may misrepresent competing events, specialized pooling strategies are required that respect the subdistribution hazard structure introduced by Fine and Gray and the distinction between cause-specific and all-cause hazard models.The Fine-Gray model is a semiparametric regression method for survival data in which two or more mutually exclusive event types compete to occur first. Proposed by Fine and Gray in 1999, it models the subdistribution hazard of each event type directly, allowing covariates to be linked to the cumulative incidence function (CIF) — the quantity that actually answers 'what is the probability of experiencing event type k by time t?'. It corrects the well-known shortcoming of standard Cox regression, which ignores competing events and thereby overestimates cause-specific probabilities.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Meta-analytic competing risks analysis · Fine-Gray Competing Risks Model. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare