ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Meta-analytic competing risks analysis×Cox比例风险模型×
领域流行病学流行病学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2000s–2010s (formalized as a pooled approach)1972
提出者Based on Fine & Gray (1999) competing risks framework; meta-analytic synthesis methods established through methodological literature (mid-2000s onward)Sir David Roxbee Cox
类型Systematic review / meta-analysisSemi-parametric regression model
开创性文献Riley, R. D., Hayden, J. A., Steyerberg, E. W., et al. (2013). Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: Prognostic Factor Research. PLOS Medicine, 10(2), e1001380. DOI ↗Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187–202. DOI ↗
别名meta-analysis of competing risks, pooled competing risks analysis, systematic review competing risksCox regression, Cox PH model, proportional hazards model, CPH
相关55
摘要Meta-analytic competing risks analysis pools results from multiple primary studies that each used a competing risks framework, allowing summary estimates of cause-specific or subdistribution hazard ratios and cumulative incidence functions. Because standard meta-analytic methods may misrepresent competing events, specialized pooling strategies are required that respect the subdistribution hazard structure introduced by Fine and Gray and the distinction between cause-specific and all-cause hazard models.The Cox proportional hazards model is a semi-parametric regression method that estimates the effect of one or more covariates on the hazard — the instantaneous rate of an event such as death, relapse, or failure — while making no assumption about the shape of the baseline hazard function. Introduced by David Cox in 1972, it is the dominant tool for multivariable survival analysis in clinical and epidemiological research.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Meta-analytic competing risks analysis · Cox proportional hazards. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare