ScholarGate
助手
Process / pipelineDisaster recovery / reconstruction assessment

Build Back Better Recovery Evaluation

Build Back Better (BBB) recovery evaluation is a principle-based framework for assessing whether post-disaster reconstruction reduces future risk rather than merely restoring pre-disaster conditions. Formalized by Sandeeka Mannakkara, Suzanne Wilkinson, and Regan Potangaroa and demonstrated in the 2009 Victorian bushfire reconstruction, the framework organizes recovery around three categories: disaster risk reduction (safer structures and siting), community recovery (social and economic restoration), and effective implementation (stakeholder engagement, regulation, and monitoring). Under each category sit concrete principles against which a recovery effort is evaluated, comparing what was achieved with what resilient recovery requires and with the pre-disaster baseline. Endorsed within the Sendai Framework and embedded in post-disaster needs assessment, BBB evaluation turns the slogan 'build back better' into an auditable standard for resilient reconstruction.

在 MethodMind 中打开即将推出应用、比较、获取指导
工具与资源
下载幻灯片
学习与探索
视频即将推出

阅读完整方法

仅限会员

使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。

登录

方法图谱

相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。

来源

  1. Mannakkara, S., Wilkinson, S., & Potangaroa, R. (2014). Build back better: implementation in Victorian bushfire reconstruction. Disasters, 38(2), 267-290. DOI: 10.1111/disa.12041
  2. GFDRR, European Union, United Nations Development Group (2013). Post-Disaster Needs Assessments Guidelines, Volume A. Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery, World Bank. link

如何引用本页

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Build Back Better (BBB) Recovery Evaluation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/disaster-studies/build-back-better-recovery-evaluation

选用哪种方法?

将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。

并排比较

被引用于

ScholarGateBuild Back Better Recovery Evaluation (Build Back Better (BBB) Recovery Evaluation). 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/disaster-studies/build-back-better-recovery-evaluation · 数据集: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026