Resource Curse Analysis
Resource curse analysis is the empirical study of the paradox that economies rich in natural resources — oil, gas, minerals — often grow more slowly, remain less democratic, and suffer more conflict than resource-poor economies. Jeffrey Sachs and Andrew Warner's influential work, summarized in their 2001 European Economic Review article, documented a robust negative cross-country correlation between resource dependence and economic growth. Michael Ross's 2001 World Politics article extended the logic to politics, showing statistically that oil wealth is associated with weaker democracy through rentier, repression, and modernization mechanisms. The workhorse method is a cross-country regression of growth or democracy on a measure of resource dependence with controls for the standard determinants of development.
Les hele metoden
Logg inn med en gratis konto for å lese denne delen.
Metodekart
Nabolaget av beslektede metoder — velg en node for å utforske.
Kilder
- Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (2001). Natural Resources and Economic Development: The Curse of Natural Resources. European Economic Review, 45(4-6), 827-838. DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00125-8 ↗
- Ross, M. L. (2001). Does Oil Hinder Democracy? World Politics, 53(3), 325-361. DOI: 10.1353/wp.2001.0011 ↗
Slik siterer du denne siden
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Resource Curse Analysis (Natural Resource Dependence and Development). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/no/political-economy/resource-curse-analysis
Hvilken metode?
Sett denne metoden ved siden av sin nærmeste slektning og les dem side om side — biblioteket legger bøkene på bordet; valget er ditt.
- Dependency AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ sammenlign
- Rent-Seeking AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ sammenlign
- State Autonomy AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ sammenlign
Lignende metoder
Funnet en feil på denne siden? Rapporter eller foreslå en rettelse →