Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Policy
Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is an economic evaluation that compares competing policies or programs by their cost relative to a single, common measure of effect — lives saved, cases averted, years of education gained, or quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Rather than valuing outcomes in money, CEA expresses results as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER): the extra cost of one option per extra unit of outcome it delivers compared with the next-best alternative. Codified in standard references such as Drummond and colleagues' Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes and the US Panel's Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine, CEA is the dominant appraisal tool for health and increasingly for other public programs with a shared outcome metric.
방법 전문 읽기
무료 계정으로 로그인하면 이 섹션을 읽을 수 있습니다.
방법 지도
관련 방법들로 이루어진 인접 영역 — 노드를 선택해 살펴보세요.
출처
- Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Claxton, K., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W. (2015). Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199665877
- Gold, M. R., Siegel, J. E., Russell, L. B., & Weinstein, M. C. (Eds.) (1996). Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780195108248
이 페이지 인용 방법
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Policy and Program Evaluation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ko/public-policy/cost-effectiveness-analysis-policy
어떤 방법일까요?
이 방법을 가장 가까운 동류의 방법들과 나란히 놓고 비교해 보세요 — 라이브러리는 책을 펼쳐 놓을 뿐, 선택은 여러분의 몫입니다.
- Benefit-Cost Analysis for PolicyPublic Policy↔ 비교
- 비용효과 분석 (CEA)보건경제학↔ 비교
- HTA(Health Technology Assessment)에서의 비용-효과 분석의료경영↔ 비교
- Multi-Criteria Policy AnalysisPublic Policy↔ 비교