Means-End Chain Laddering
Means-end chain analysis explains consumer choice by linking the concrete attributes of a product to the consequences of using it and ultimately to the personal values those consequences serve. Jonathan Gutman's 1982 model proposed that consumers categorize products by the desirable consequences they deliver, and that these consequences are valued because they help attain higher-order life values, so a chain runs attribute to consequence to value. Laddering, formalized by Thomas Reynolds and Jonathan Gutman, is the interviewing technique that uncovers these chains by repeatedly asking why a feature matters until the respondent reaches the underlying values. The resulting ladders are content-coded into attributes, consequences, and values, then summarized in an implication matrix counting how often each element leads to another. Applying a cutoff to that matrix yields a hierarchical value map (HVM), a network showing the dominant attribute-consequence-value pathways for the category. The approach reveals not just what consumers want but why, providing a values-grounded foundation for positioning and advertising strategy.
방법 전문 읽기
무료 계정으로 로그인하면 이 섹션을 읽을 수 있습니다.
방법 지도
관련 방법들로 이루어진 인접 영역 — 노드를 선택해 살펴보세요.
출처
- Gutman, J. (1982). A Means-End Chain Model Based on Consumer Categorization Processes. Journal of Marketing, 46(2), 60-72. DOI: 10.1177/002224298204600207 ↗
- Reynolds, T. J., & Gutman, J. (1988). Laddering Theory, Method, Analysis, and Interpretation. Journal of Advertising Research, 28(1), 11-31. DOI: 10.1080/00218499.1988.12467766 ↗
이 페이지 인용 방법
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Means-End Chain Analysis and Laddering (Attributes-Consequences-Values). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ko/marketing/means-end-chain-laddering
어떤 방법일까요?
이 방법을 가장 가까운 동류의 방법들과 나란히 놓고 비교해 보세요 — 라이브러리는 책을 펼쳐 놓을 뿐, 선택은 여러분의 몫입니다.
- Implicit Reaction-Time Brand Measures마케팅↔ 비교
- Projective Techniques in Consumer Research마케팅↔ 비교
- ZMET (Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique)마케팅↔ 비교