Cone of Plausibility
The cone of plausibility, often called the futures cone, is a framing device for scenario work that projects a baseline 'expected' future and then bounds a widening cone of alternative futures around it by varying the key drivers and assumptions on which that baseline rests. Drawn from the present at the cone's apex, the trajectory fans out as it extends into the future, because uncertainty compounds over time and the range of futures that remain plausible grows wider the further out one looks. Joseph Voros, building on Charles Taylor's earlier cone imagery, formalized the device by nesting categories of futures — possible, plausible, probable, and preferable — within the cone, giving foresight practitioners a shared vocabulary for distinguishing what could conceivably happen from what could reasonably happen and from what is most likely. As Bishop, Hines, and Collins note in their survey of scenario techniques, the cone provides a disciplined way to generate and bound a manageable set of alternative scenarios.
방법 전문 읽기
무료 계정으로 로그인하면 이 섹션을 읽을 수 있습니다.
방법 지도
관련 방법들로 이루어진 인접 영역 — 노드를 선택해 살펴보세요.
출처
- Voros, J. (2003). A generic foresight process framework. Foresight, 5(3), 10-21. DOI: 10.1108/14636680310698379 ↗
- Bishop, P., Hines, A., & Collins, T. (2007). The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques. Foresight, 9(1), 5-25. DOI: 10.1108/14636680710727516 ↗
이 페이지 인용 방법
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Cone of Plausibility (Futures Cone of Projected, Plausible, and Possible Futures). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ko/futures-foresight-studies/cone-of-plausibility
어떤 방법일까요?
이 방법을 가장 가까운 동류의 방법들과 나란히 놓고 비교해 보세요 — 라이브러리는 책을 펼쳐 놓을 뿐, 선택은 여러분의 몫입니다.
- Environmental Scanning for ForesightFutures Foresight Studies↔ 비교
- Intuitive Logics Scenario PlanningFutures Foresight Studies↔ 비교
- Seven Questions Scenario MethodFutures Foresight Studies↔ 비교