Dator's Four Futures Archetypes
Dator's Four Futures Archetypes is a deductive, template-driven approach to scenario construction in which four generic story-shapes — continuation (continued growth), collapse, discipline, and transformation — are used as ready-made skeletons onto which the specifics of a given domain are mapped. Where inductive scenario methods build narratives bottom-up from combinations of driving forces, the archetype method starts top-down from Jim Dator's empirically distilled typology of generic futures and asks what each archetype would look like for this particular question. Bishop, Hines and Collins, in their 2007 review of scenario techniques, classify this as one of the principal scenario-development families, valued because the archetypes guarantee a divergent, comprehensible set without the combinatorial explosion of fully inductive methods. The output is a small, contrasting suite of scenarios that share a common, recognizable logic.
방법 전문 읽기
무료 계정으로 로그인하면 이 섹션을 읽을 수 있습니다.
방법 지도
관련 방법들로 이루어진 인접 영역 — 노드를 선택해 살펴보세요.
출처
- Dator, J. (2009). Alternative futures at the Manoa School. Journal of Futures Studies, 14(2), 1-18. link ↗
- Bishop, P., Hines, A., & Collins, T. (2007). The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques. Foresight, 9(1), 5-25. DOI: 10.1108/14636680710727516 ↗
이 페이지 인용 방법
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Dator's Four Futures Archetypes (Archetype-Based Scenario Construction). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ko/futures-foresight-studies/dator-scenario-archetypes
어떤 방법일까요?
이 방법을 가장 가까운 동류의 방법들과 나란히 놓고 비교해 보세요 — 라이브러리는 책을 펼쳐 놓을 뿐, 선택은 여러분의 몫입니다.
- Causal Layered AnalysisFutures Foresight Studies↔ 비교
- Intuitive Logics Scenario PlanningFutures Foresight Studies↔ 비교
- Manoa Alternative Futures MethodFutures Foresight Studies↔ 비교
- Three Horizons FrameworkFutures Foresight Studies↔ 비교