Regression Discontinuity in Elections
Regression discontinuity in elections is a quasi-experimental design that exploits the sharp winning threshold in electoral contests to estimate causal effects of holding office. Just above the threshold a candidate or party wins; just below, it loses. In very close races, which side ends up just over the line is plausibly as good as random, so comparing the later outcomes of bare winners and bare losers identifies the causal effect of winning — most famously the incumbency advantage — without confounding by candidate or district quality.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- Lee, D. S. (2008). Randomized Experiments from Non-random Selection in U.S. House Elections. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 675–697. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.004 ↗
- Lee, D. S., & Lemieux, T. (2010). Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 281–355. DOI: 10.1257/jel.48.2.281 ↗
- Eggers, A. C., Fowler, A., Hainmueller, J., Hall, A. B., & Snyder, J. M. (2015). On the Validity of the Regression Discontinuity Design for Estimating Electoral Effects: New Evidence from Over 40,000 Close Races. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 259–274. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12127 ↗
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Regression Discontinuity Design in Close Elections. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/political-science/regression-discontinuity-in-elections
どの手法を選ぶ？
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- 差分の差 (Difference-in-Differences, DiD)計量経済学↔ 比較
- Most Similar Systems DesignPolitical Science↔ 比較
- 回帰不連続デザイン（Regression Discontinuity Design, RDD）因果推論↔ 比較