Means-End Chain Laddering
Means-end chain analysis explains consumer choice by linking the concrete attributes of a product to the consequences of using it and ultimately to the personal values those consequences serve. Jonathan Gutman's 1982 model proposed that consumers categorize products by the desirable consequences they deliver, and that these consequences are valued because they help attain higher-order life values, so a chain runs attribute to consequence to value. Laddering, formalized by Thomas Reynolds and Jonathan Gutman, is the interviewing technique that uncovers these chains by repeatedly asking why a feature matters until the respondent reaches the underlying values. The resulting ladders are content-coded into attributes, consequences, and values, then summarized in an implication matrix counting how often each element leads to another. Applying a cutoff to that matrix yields a hierarchical value map (HVM), a network showing the dominant attribute-consequence-value pathways for the category. The approach reveals not just what consumers want but why, providing a values-grounded foundation for positioning and advertising strategy.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- Gutman, J. (1982). A Means-End Chain Model Based on Consumer Categorization Processes. Journal of Marketing, 46(2), 60-72. DOI: 10.1177/002224298204600207 ↗
- Reynolds, T. J., & Gutman, J. (1988). Laddering Theory, Method, Analysis, and Interpretation. Journal of Advertising Research, 28(1), 11-31. DOI: 10.1080/00218499.1988.12467766 ↗
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Means-End Chain Analysis and Laddering (Attributes-Consequences-Values). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/marketing/means-end-chain-laddering
どの手法を選ぶ?
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- Implicit Reaction-Time Brand Measuresマーケティング↔ 比較
- Projective Techniques in Consumer Researchマーケティング↔ 比較
- ZMET (Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique)マーケティング↔ 比較