Boundary-Work Analysis
Boundary-work analysis studies how the line between science and non-science is drawn, defended, and contested—not by philosophers laying down timeless criteria, but by actors doing rhetorical work to secure authority, resources, and credibility. Introduced by Thomas Gieryn in 1983 and elaborated in his 1999 book Cultural Boundaries of Science, the approach treats demarcation as a practical, strategic, and historically variable accomplishment. The method examines the discourse of demarcation episodes to reveal the strategies—expansion, expulsion, and protection of autonomy—through which the cultural map of science is redrawn whenever its credibility is on the line.
Lire la méthode complète
Connectez-vous avec un compte gratuit pour lire cette section.
Carte des méthodes
Le voisinage des méthodes apparentées — sélectionnez un nœud pour explorer.
Sources
- Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781-795. DOI: 10.2307/2095325 ↗
- Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226292625
Comment citer cette page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Boundary-Work Analysis (Demarcation of Science). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/fr/science-technology-studies/boundary-work-analysis
Quelle méthode ?
Placez cette méthode aux côtés de ses plus proches parentes et lisez-les côte à côte — la bibliothèque pose les ouvrages sur la table ; le choix vous revient.
- Controversy MappingScience Technology Studies↔ comparer
- Laboratory EthnographyScience Technology Studies↔ comparer
- Sociotechnical Imaginaries AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ comparer
- Technological Frames AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ comparer
Référencée par
Méthodes similaires
Une erreur sur cette page ? Signalez-la ou proposez une correction →