Redaction Criticism
Redaction criticism (Redaktionsgeschichte) studies the biblical authors not as passive collectors of tradition but as genuine authors and theologians who shaped their inherited material to make a point. Where form criticism dissolved the Gospels into independent oral units, redaction criticism puts the spotlight back on the evangelist who selected, arranged, and edited those units. By comparing the final text with the sources and traditions behind it, the critic isolates the changes the author made, looks for a consistent pattern in those changes, and reads off the theological program that motivated them. Hans Conzelmann's 1953 study of Luke is the classic example, and Norman Perrin's 1969 primer What Is Redaction Criticism? introduced the method to English readers and articulated its logic.
Lire la méthode complète
Connectez-vous avec un compte gratuit pour lire cette section.
Carte des méthodes
Le voisinage des méthodes apparentées — sélectionnez un nœud pour explorer.
Sources
- Perrin, N. (1969). What Is Redaction Criticism? Philadelphia: Fortress Press. ISBN: 9780800601812
- Conzelmann, H. (1960). The Theology of St Luke (trans. G. Buswell). New York: Harper. [German 'Die Mitte der Zeit', 1953]. link ↗
Comment citer cette page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Redaction Criticism (Redaktionsgeschichte: Editorial Theology of the Final Author). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/fr/religious-studies/redaction-criticism
Quelle méthode ?
Placez cette méthode aux côtés de ses plus proches parentes et lisez-les côte à côte — la bibliothèque pose les ouvrages sur la table ; le choix vous revient.
- Form CriticismReligious Studies↔ comparer
- Historical-Critical ExegesisReligious Studies↔ comparer
- Intertextuality AnalysisReligious Studies↔ comparer
- Source Criticism (Documentary Hypothesis)Religious Studies↔ comparer
Référencée par
Méthodes similaires
Une erreur sur cette page ? Signalez-la ou proposez une correction →