ScholarGate
Assistant
Process / pipelineOrganizational behavior / survey methodology

Common Method Bias Remedies

Common method bias remedies are the procedural and statistical tools researchers use to detect and reduce the spurious covariance that arises when constructs are measured with the same method — typically a single self-report survey. Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Lee, and Podsakoff's 2003 review crystallized the problem, cataloguing the many sources of method bias and the design and analysis safeguards available, and it became the field's reference point. Because the same respondent, rating scale, and occasion can inflate correlations among unrelated constructs, method variance can manufacture or distort relationships that researchers then mistake for substance. The remedies fall into two families: procedural design choices that prevent method variance from entering the data, and statistical techniques that diagnose or partial it out afterward. Lindell and Whitney's marker-variable approach and Williams, Hartman, and Cavazotte's confirmatory-factor-analysis marker technique are the leading statistical correctives. Used together, these remedies make method bias a problem to be designed against and tested for rather than assumed away.

Ouvrir dans MethodMindBientôtAppliquer, comparer, obtenir des conseils
Outils et ressources
Télécharger les diapositives
Apprendre et explorer
VidéoBientôt

Lire la méthode complète

Réservé aux membres

Connectez-vous avec un compte gratuit pour lire cette section.

Se connecter

Carte des méthodes

Le voisinage des méthodes apparentées — sélectionnez un nœud pour explorer.

Sources

  1. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  2. Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114-121. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114
  3. Williams, L. J., Hartman, N., & Cavazotte, F. (2010). Method variance and marker variables: A review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 477-514. DOI: 10.1177/1094428110366036

Comment citer cette page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Common Method Bias Remedies (Harman, Marker-Variable, and CFA Marker Techniques). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/fr/organizational-behavior/common-method-bias-remedies

Quelle méthode ?

Placez cette méthode aux côtés de ses plus proches parentes et lisez-les côte à côte — la bibliothèque pose les ouvrages sur la table ; le choix vous revient.

Comparer côte à côte

Référencée par

ScholarGateCommon Method Bias Remedies (Common Method Bias Remedies (Harman, Marker-Variable, and CFA Marker Techniques)). Consulté le 2026-06-24 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/organizational-behavior/common-method-bias-remedies · Jeu de données : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026