ScholarGate
Assistant
Process / pipelineOrganizational behavior / personnel psychology

Psychometric Meta-Analysis

Psychometric meta-analysis is the Hunter-Schmidt approach to cumulating research findings while correcting for the statistical artifacts that distort individual studies. Frank Schmidt and John Hunter developed it to solve the problem of validity generalization: across many studies the observed validity of a selection test varied widely, leading people to conclude that validity was situationally specific, when in fact most of the variation was an illusion produced by small samples, unreliable measures, and restricted ranges. Their 1977 Journal of Applied Psychology paper showed that once these artifacts are removed, the apparent variability shrinks and a stable true validity emerges that generalizes across settings. The full method, codified in their book Methods of Meta-Analysis, pools effect sizes, subtracts the variance due to sampling error, and corrects the mean and remaining variance for measurement unreliability and range restriction. It estimates not only the average true effect but how much it really varies and whether it generalizes.

Ouvrir dans MethodMindBientôtAppliquer, comparer, obtenir des conseils
Outils et ressources
Télécharger les diapositives
Apprendre et explorer
VidéoBientôt

Lire la méthode complète

Réservé aux membres

Connectez-vous avec un compte gratuit pour lire cette section.

Se connecter

Carte des méthodes

Le voisinage des méthodes apparentées — sélectionnez un nœud pour explorer.

Sources

  1. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 9781412904797
  2. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(5), 529-540. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.62.5.529

Comment citer cette page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Psychometric Meta-Analysis (Hunter-Schmidt Validity Generalization). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/fr/organizational-behavior/psychometric-meta-analysis

Quelle méthode ?

Placez cette méthode aux côtés de ses plus proches parentes et lisez-les côte à côte — la bibliothèque pose les ouvrages sur la table ; le choix vous revient.

Comparer côte à côte

Référencée par

ScholarGatePsychometric Meta-Analysis (Psychometric Meta-Analysis (Hunter-Schmidt Validity Generalization)). Consulté le 2026-06-24 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/organizational-behavior/psychometric-meta-analysis · Jeu de données : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026