Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›ELECTRE I — ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité
MCDMOutrankingcrisp

ELECTRE I — ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité

ELECTRE (ELECTRE I — ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité) is a outranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Roy, B. in 1968. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

ELECTRE
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITICCONDORCETData-Driven MCDA

+3 more

When to use it

ELECTRE I produces a partial preorder (outranking graph) and a kernel (non-dominated set), not a complete ranking. An alternative a outranks b if C(a,b) ≥ c̄ AND D(a,b) ≤ d̄. The kernel is the recommended choice set. Alternatives not in the kernel may still be incomparable (not dominated). Adjust thresholds c̄ and d̄ to reflect the decision-maker's tolerance for inconsistency and veto.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • May exhibit rank reversal when alternatives are added to or removed from the set.

Sources

  1. Roy, B. (1968). Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la méthode ELECTRE). Revue Française d'Informatique et de Recherche Opérationnelle DOI: 10.1051/ro/196802v100571 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). ELECTRE I — ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/electre

Related methods

AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • AHPDecision-making↔ compare
  • ANPDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWMDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWM-BAYESIANDecision-making↔ compare
  • CCSDDecision-making↔ compare
  • CILOSDecision-making↔ compare
  • CIMASDecision-making↔ compare
  • CRITICDecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

CONDORCETData-Driven MCDADODGSONOrdinal Priority ApproachPROMETHEE-GAIA

Similar methods

ELECTRE-IELECTRE-IIELECTRE-IIIELECTRE-IVFUZZY-ELECTRE-IELECTRE-TRIFUZZY-ELECTRE-IIHF-ELECTRE-I

Related reference concepts

Decision MakingDecision Support SystemsDecision Theory and UtilityCriteria for Decision-Making under Risk and UncertaintyDelphi TechniqueDecision Making Skills

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — ELECTRE (ELECTRE I — ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/electre · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Roy, B.
Subfamily
Outranking
Year
1968
Type
Concordance–discordance (crisp outranking)
Value Space
crisp
Uncertainty
None
Compensation
None
Rank Reversal
Yes
Related methods
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account