Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›Dodgson Method — Condorcet completion by minimum pairwise swaps
MCDMAggregationOperatorcrisp

Dodgson Method — Condorcet completion by minimum pairwise swaps

DODGSON (Dodgson Method — Condorcet completion by minimum pairwise swaps) is a aggregationoperator multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Dodgson, C. L. in 1900. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

DODGSON
AHPELECTREPROMETHEETOPSISVIKORAVERAGE-RANKINGBRAUERS-DOMINANCECOOK-SEIFORDMEDIAN-RANKINGNANSON

When to use it

Dodgson selects the alternative that is 'closest' to being a Condorcet winner — measured in pairwise swap distance. Always returns a winner (no paradox), but winner determination is NP-hard for unrestricted preference profiles. For m ≤ 10, exhaustive search is practical; beyond that, use approximation algorithms. Orakçı 2024 (Bölüm 3) shows Dodgson fails to produce full rankings in 82-99% of random samples for m ≥ 3 — use Kemeny or RAT for guaranteed full rankings.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • Results depend on the chosen normalisation, weights, and parameter settings.

Sources

  1. Dodgson, C. L. (1900). A method of taking votes on more than two issues (1876). Pamphlet, Clarendon Press, Oxford (original 1876) link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Dodgson Method — Condorcet completion by minimum pairwise swaps. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/dodgson

Related methods

AHPELECTREPROMETHEETOPSISVIKOR

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • AHPDecision-making↔ compare
  • ELECTREDecision-making↔ compare
  • PROMETHEEDecision-making↔ compare
  • TOPSISDecision-making↔ compare
  • VIKORDecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

AVERAGE-RANKINGBRAUERS-DOMINANCECOOK-SEIFORDMEDIAN-RANKINGNANSON

Similar methods

CONDORCETKEMENY-YOUNGCOPELANDBORDAAVERAGE-RANKINGCOOK-SEIFORDNANSONMEDIAN-RANKING

Related reference concepts

Decision Theory and UtilityApproximation AlgorithmsNP-Completeness and ReductionsSocial Choice • Clubs • Committees • AssociationsMechanism DesignNP-Completeness and Intractability

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — DODGSON (Dodgson Method — Condorcet completion by minimum pairwise swaps). Retrieved 2026-07-20 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/dodgson · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Dodgson, C. L.
Subfamily
AggregationOperator
Year
1900
Type
Pairwise-swap distance — alternative needing fewest swaps to become Condorcet winner
Value Space
crisp
Uncertainty
None
Compensation
N/A
Rank Reversal
No
Related methods
AHPELECTREPROMETHEETOPSISVIKOR
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account