Dynamic Panel Models in Politics
Dynamic panel models for political science analyze time-series cross-section (TSCS) data — repeated observations on countries, dyads, states, or other units over many years — where the outcome today depends on its own past. By including a lagged dependent variable alongside unit fixed effects, these models capture persistence and inertia common in comparative politics and international relations, but doing so introduces the Nickell bias. Estimators such as Arellano-Bond and system GMM, and design choices such as Beck-Katz panel-corrected standard errors, were developed to recover credible dynamic estimates from such data.
Læs hele metoden
Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.
Metodekort
Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.
Kilder
- Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634–647. DOI: 10.2307/2082979 ↗
- Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. DOI: 10.2307/2297968 ↗
Sådan citerer du denne side
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Dynamic Panel Models for Political Science (Lagged Dependent Variable Panels). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/political-science/dynamic-panel-politics
Hvilken metode?
Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.
- Arellano-Bond GMM-estimatorØkonometri↔ sammenlign
- Dynamisk PaneldatamodelØkonometri↔ sammenlign
- PaneldataanalyseØkonometri↔ sammenlign
- System GMM (Arellano-Bover / Blundell-Bond)Økonometri↔ sammenlign
Lignende metoder
Relaterede referencebegreber
Har du fundet en fejl på denne side? Indberet den eller foreslå en rettelse →