ScholarGate
助手
Process / pipelineClinical significance / reliable change

Standardized Clinical Cutoff

The standardized clinical cutoff approach, developed by Jacobson and Truax, judges whether an individual client's change on a standardized measure is both statistically reliable and clinically meaningful. It pairs a Reliable Change Index — which asks whether a pre-to-post change is larger than the measurement error of the instrument — with a cutoff score that marks the boundary between the dysfunctional and functional (normal) populations. A client who moves reliably across that cutoff is counted as recovered, giving practice and research a defensible, individual-level definition of meaningful improvement.

在 MethodMind 中打开即将推出应用、比较、获取指导
工具与资源
下载幻灯片
学习与探索
视频即将推出

阅读完整方法

仅限会员

使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。

登录

方法图谱

相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。

来源

  1. Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12
  2. Evans, C., Margison, F., & Barkham, M. (1998). The contribution of reliable and clinically significant change methods to evidence-based mental health. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 1(3), 70–72. DOI: 10.1136/ebmh.1.3.70

如何引用本页

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Clinical Significance: Standardized Cutoff and Reliable Change Methods. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/social-work/standardized-clinical-cutoff

选用哪种方法?

将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。

并排比较

被引用于

ScholarGateStandardized Clinical Cutoff (Clinical Significance: Standardized Cutoff and Reliable Change Methods). 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/social-work/standardized-clinical-cutoff · 数据集: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026