ScholarGate
助手
Process / pipelinePatient-reported outcome

锚定最小重要性差异法

锚定最小重要性差异(Minimal Clinically Important Difference, MCID)法是一种确定患者报告结局(patient-reported outcome, PRO)中患者或临床医生认为有意义或重要的最小变化的技法。该方法由 Guyatt、Jaeschke 和 Singer 于 1989 年开创,它将结局评分的变化与外部具有临床意义的事件或判断联系起来,使研究人员和临床医生能够判断治疗效果是否代表了真实、与患者相关的改善。

在 MethodMind 中打开即将推出视频即将推出下载幻灯片

阅读完整方法

仅限会员

使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。

登录

方法图谱

相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。

来源

  1. Jaeschke, R., Singer, J., & Guyatt, G. H. (1989). Measurement of health status: Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Controlled Clinical Trials, 10(4), 407-415. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6
  2. Revicki, D., Hays, R. D., Cella, D., & Sloan, J. (2008). Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(2), 102-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012
  3. Copay, A. G., Chung, A. S., Pfeiffer, T., Borframes, R., Braswell, K., Chou, L. C., & Spangehl, M. J. (2007). Minimum clinically important difference: a review of nomenclature, methods, and applications in speech-language pathology. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 15(4), xlii-xliii. link

如何引用本页

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Anchor-Based Method for Establishing Minimal Important Difference (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) in Patient-Reported Outcomes. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/psychometrics/anchor-based-minimal-important-difference

选用哪种方法?

将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。

并排比较

被引用于

ScholarGateAnchor-Based Minimal Important Difference (Anchor-Based Method for Establishing Minimal Important Difference (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) in Patient-Reported Outcomes). 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/psychometrics/anchor-based-minimal-important-difference · 数据集: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026