ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Standardized Clinical Cutoff×Strengths Assessment×
领域Social WorkSocial Work
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19912012
提出者Neil S. Jacobson & Paula TruaxDennis Saleebey (strengths perspective); Charles Rapp & Richard Goscha (strengths model assessment)
类型Method for judging whether individual change on a standardized measure is reliable and clinically meaningfulStructured, domain-based assessment of client and environmental strengths
开创性文献Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19. DOI ↗Saleebey, D. (Ed.). (2013). The Strengths Perspective in Social Work Practice (6th ed.). Pearson. ISBN: 9780205011544
别名Clinical Cutoff Score, Clinical Significance Method, Reliable Change Index, Jacobson-Truax MethodStrengths-Based Assessment, Strengths Perspective Assessment, Strengths Model Assessment, Asset-Based Assessment
相关33
摘要The standardized clinical cutoff approach, developed by Jacobson and Truax, judges whether an individual client's change on a standardized measure is both statistically reliable and clinically meaningful. It pairs a Reliable Change Index — which asks whether a pre-to-post change is larger than the measurement error of the instrument — with a cutoff score that marks the boundary between the dysfunctional and functional (normal) populations. A client who moves reliably across that cutoff is counted as recovered, giving practice and research a defensible, individual-level definition of meaningful improvement.Strengths assessment is a structured way of assessing a client that deliberately foregrounds capabilities, resources, and aspirations rather than deficits and problems. Grounded in the strengths perspective articulated by Dennis Saleebey and operationalized in Charles Rapp and Richard Goscha's strengths model, it surveys the client's life domains — such as daily living, health, finances, relationships, leisure, and spirituality — to record what is already working, what the person wants, and the personal and environmental resources available to get there. Those strengths then become the raw material for goal-setting and intervention.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Standardized Clinical Cutoff · Strengths Assessment. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare