ScholarGate
助手
Process / pipelineScale development

内容效度比

内容效度比(CVR)是查尔斯·劳什(Charles Lawshe)于1975年开发的一种定量方法,用于评估测量工具中的项目与目标构念的相关性和代表性程度。该方法将专家小组的判断汇总为每个项目的单一效度系数,使研究人员能够识别并仅保留那些被领域专家视为必不可少(essential)的项目。在量表开发过程中,CVR为内容效度声明提供了客观支持。

在 MethodMind 中打开即将推出视频即将推出Download slides

阅读完整方法

仅限会员

使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。

登录

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

来源

  1. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. link
  2. Tristán-López, A. (2008). Modification of the content validity ratio. Revista Educación y Pedagogía, 20(48), 11-18. link
  3. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure? Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489-497. link

如何引用本页

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio Method for Expert Panel Assessment. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/psychometrics/content-validity-ratio

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

Compare side by side

被引用于

ScholarGateContent Validity Ratio (Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio Method for Expert Panel Assessment). 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/psychometrics/content-validity-ratio · 数据集: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026