Means-End Chain Laddering
Means-end chain analysis explains consumer choice by linking the concrete attributes of a product to the consequences of using it and ultimately to the personal values those consequences serve. Jonathan Gutman's 1982 model proposed that consumers categorize products by the desirable consequences they deliver, and that these consequences are valued because they help attain higher-order life values, so a chain runs attribute to consequence to value. Laddering, formalized by Thomas Reynolds and Jonathan Gutman, is the interviewing technique that uncovers these chains by repeatedly asking why a feature matters until the respondent reaches the underlying values. The resulting ladders are content-coded into attributes, consequences, and values, then summarized in an implication matrix counting how often each element leads to another. Applying a cutoff to that matrix yields a hierarchical value map (HVM), a network showing the dominant attribute-consequence-value pathways for the category. The approach reveals not just what consumers want but why, providing a values-grounded foundation for positioning and advertising strategy.
阅读完整方法
使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。
方法图谱
相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。
来源
- Gutman, J. (1982). A Means-End Chain Model Based on Consumer Categorization Processes. Journal of Marketing, 46(2), 60-72. DOI: 10.1177/002224298204600207 ↗
- Reynolds, T. J., & Gutman, J. (1988). Laddering Theory, Method, Analysis, and Interpretation. Journal of Advertising Research, 28(1), 11-31. DOI: 10.1080/00218499.1988.12467766 ↗
如何引用本页
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Means-End Chain Analysis and Laddering (Attributes-Consequences-Values). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/marketing/means-end-chain-laddering
选用哪种方法?
将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。
- Implicit Reaction-Time Brand Measures市场营销↔ 比较
- Projective Techniques in Consumer Research市场营销↔ 比较
- ZMET (Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique)市场营销↔ 比较