方法对比

	CURB-65肺炎严重程度评分	快速序贯器官衰竭评估（qSOFA）评分	Wells DVT评分
领域	临床评估	临床评估	临床评估
方法族	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
起源年份	2003	2016	1994
提出者	W. Staniford Lim, et al.	Sepsis-3 Taskforce	Philip S. Wells
类型	Community-acquired pneumonia severity assessment	Rapid sepsis screening	Venous thromboembolism risk stratification
开创性文献	Lim, W. S., van der Eerden, M. M., Laing, R., et al. (2003). Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax, 58(5), 377-382.	Singer, M., Deutschman, C. S., Seymour, C. W., et al. (2016). The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, 315(8), 801-810.	Wells, P. S., Hirsh, J., Anderson, D. R., et al. (1994). A simple clinical model for the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis combined with impedance plethysmography. Archives of Internal Medicine, 154(13), 1541-1546.
别名	CURB-65, Pneumonia severity	Quick SOFA, qSOFA	Wells DVT Score, DVT Wells
相关	3	3	3
摘要	CURB-65, derived and validated by Lim et al. in 2003, is a 5-point severity of illness score for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). It assesses confusion, urea nitrogen, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and age ≥65 years to stratify mortality risk and guide admission and treatment decisions.	The Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score, introduced by the Sepsis-3 taskforce in 2016, is a rapid 3-variable bedside screening tool for identifying non-ICU patients at high risk of sepsis-related mortality. It uses altered mentation, systolic hypotension, and tachypnea to quickly stratify patients without requiring laboratory testing.	The Wells score, developed by Wells et al. in 1994, is a clinical prediction rule that stratifies patients into low, intermediate, or high pretest probability of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). It combines seven clinical features to guide diagnostic testing decisions and reduce unnecessary imaging in suspected DVT patients.