ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分×Wells DVT评分×
领域临床评估临床评估
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20161994
提出者Sepsis-3 TaskforcePhilip S. Wells
类型Rapid sepsis screeningVenous thromboembolism risk stratification
开创性文献Singer, M., Deutschman, C. S., Seymour, C. W., et al. (2016). The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, 315(8), 801-810. DOI ↗Wells, P. S., Hirsh, J., Anderson, D. R., et al. (1994). A simple clinical model for the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis combined with impedance plethysmography. Archives of Internal Medicine, 154(13), 1541-1546. link ↗
别名Quick SOFA, qSOFAWells DVT Score, DVT Wells
相关33
摘要The Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score, introduced by the Sepsis-3 taskforce in 2016, is a rapid 3-variable bedside screening tool for identifying non-ICU patients at high risk of sepsis-related mortality. It uses altered mentation, systolic hypotension, and tachypnea to quickly stratify patients without requiring laboratory testing.The Wells score, developed by Wells et al. in 1994, is a clinical prediction rule that stratifies patients into low, intermediate, or high pretest probability of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). It combines seven clinical features to guide diagnostic testing decisions and reduce unnecessary imaging in suspected DVT patients.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: qSOFA Score · Wells Score for DVT. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare