方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| CURB-65肺炎严重程度评分× | Wells DVT评分× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 临床评估 | 临床评估 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2003 | 1994 |
| 提出者≠ | W. Staniford Lim, et al. | Philip S. Wells |
| 类型≠ | Community-acquired pneumonia severity assessment | Venous thromboembolism risk stratification |
| 开创性文献≠ | Lim, W. S., van der Eerden, M. M., Laing, R., et al. (2003). Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax, 58(5), 377-382. DOI ↗ | Wells, P. S., Hirsh, J., Anderson, D. R., et al. (1994). A simple clinical model for the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis combined with impedance plethysmography. Archives of Internal Medicine, 154(13), 1541-1546. link ↗ |
| 别名 | CURB-65, Pneumonia severity | Wells DVT Score, DVT Wells |
| 相关 | 3 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | CURB-65, derived and validated by Lim et al. in 2003, is a 5-point severity of illness score for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). It assesses confusion, urea nitrogen, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and age ≥65 years to stratify mortality risk and guide admission and treatment decisions. | The Wells score, developed by Wells et al. in 1994, is a clinical prediction rule that stratifies patients into low, intermediate, or high pretest probability of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). It combines seven clinical features to guide diagnostic testing decisions and reduce unnecessary imaging in suspected DVT patients. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|