ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

CURB-65肺炎严重程度评分×快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分×
领域临床评估临床评估
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20032016
提出者W. Staniford Lim, et al.Sepsis-3 Taskforce
类型Community-acquired pneumonia severity assessmentRapid sepsis screening
开创性文献Lim, W. S., van der Eerden, M. M., Laing, R., et al. (2003). Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax, 58(5), 377-382. DOI ↗Singer, M., Deutschman, C. S., Seymour, C. W., et al. (2016). The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, 315(8), 801-810. DOI ↗
别名CURB-65, Pneumonia severityQuick SOFA, qSOFA
相关33
摘要CURB-65, derived and validated by Lim et al. in 2003, is a 5-point severity of illness score for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). It assesses confusion, urea nitrogen, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and age ≥65 years to stratify mortality risk and guide admission and treatment decisions.The Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score, introduced by the Sepsis-3 taskforce in 2016, is a rapid 3-variable bedside screening tool for identifying non-ICU patients at high risk of sepsis-related mortality. It uses altered mentation, systolic hypotension, and tachypnea to quickly stratify patients without requiring laboratory testing.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: CURB-65 Pneumonia Severity Score · qSOFA Score. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare