ScholarGate
Descoperă
BibliotecăBiblioteca meaBirouPreflightReview StudioAsistent
Spațiu de lucru
Compară
Construiește-ți biblioteca

Salvează metode, organizează colecții și du-le pe biroul tău.

Creare cont
Bibliotecă
 / Răsfoiește
Autentificare
Biblioteca

Explorează știința după metodă, domeniu și dovezi.

Un singur catalog de metode de cercetare — află cum funcționează fiecare, când se folosește și ce nu poate face.

6,499 metode11 domenii7 familii de metode40 limbi
Atlasul științeiCartografiază structura științei înainte să o folosești.Domenii · metode · trasee de doveziExplorează harta
DomeniuHealth & Medicine716Psychology570Business & Finance410Engineering330Life Sciences263Education261Research Practice
ScholarGate

O bibliotecă de referință centrată pe conținut despre metodele de cercetare: ce este fiecare, cum funcționează și de unde provine.

Date deschise (CC-BY)

Descoperă

  • Bibliotecă
  • Caută metode…
  • Răsfoiește după domeniu
  • Domenii
  • Traseu
  • Compară
  • Ce metodă?

Referințe

  • Discipline
  • Atlas
  • Glosar
  • Metodologie
  • Filosofie

Spațiu de lucru

  • Biblioteca mea
  • Birou
  • Chat

Companie

  • Despre
  • Prețuri
  • Contact
  • Sugerează o metodă

Articolele sunt compilate din surse publicate, în scop de referință. Verificarea acurateței și a caracterului adecvat al oricărei informații pentru utilizarea proprie rămâne responsabilitatea dumneavoastră.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Bibliotecă de referință pentru metode de cercetare
  • Confidențialitate
  • Cookie-uri
  • Termeni
  • Șterge contul
248
Natural Sciences236
Social Sciences185
Environment & Sustainability160
Law30
MetodăStatistică1,836IA și învățare automată1,661Științele deciziei932Metode de cercetare1,354Măsurare1,745Cauzalitate și dovezi532Practica cercetării118
15 metode în Education · Cauzalitate și doveziȘterge
Metodele aflate la intersecția celor două filtre ale tale.
SorteazăPopularitateA–ZZ–ACele mai noi
health education

CLES+T

The CLES+T is a 34-item self-report questionnaire measuring nursing students' perceptions of their clinical learning environment and the quality of supervision received from their clinical preceptor or teacher. Originally developed by Saarikoski and colleagues in 2007 and expanded in 2008 to include a specific teacher

2 surse2007
health education

CTQS

The CTQS is a self-report questionnaire measuring students' perceptions of their clinical educator's (preceptor, clinical instructor, or mentor) teaching quality and effectiveness. Developed by Ohrling, Hallberg, and Gaberson in the early 2000s, the CTQS evaluates dimensions of clinical teaching including role modeling

2 surse2001
health education

DASH

The DASH is a 20-item observer-rated instrument measuring the quality of debriefing—the structured, facilitated reflection following a healthcare simulation activity. Developed by Rudolph, Simon, and Raemer in 2006 at Massachusetts General Hospital, the DASH evaluates the debriefing facilitator's ability to create a ps

2 surse2006
psychometrics

GRM

The Graded Response Model is an item response theory model developed by Fumiko Samejima in 1969 for ordered polytomous items such as Likert-type scales. It estimates both the discriminating power of each item and a set of threshold parameters marking the boundaries between adjacent response categories, while simultaneo

2 surse1969
health education

IPCS

The IPCS is a self-report questionnaire measuring healthcare professionals' and students' attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors regarding interprofessional collaboration and teamwork. Developed through research by Hind and colleagues in 2003 and refined in subsequent interprofessional education studies, the IPCS evaluates

2 surse2003
health education

NCCS

The NCCS is a multidimensional self-assessment and clinician-rated instrument measuring nursing students' perceived and observed clinical competence across technical, interpersonal, and cognitive domains. Developed by Walt and van der Walt in 2009, the scale evaluates students' mastery of fundamental nursing skills, cr

2 surse2009
psychometrics

Ordinal Content Validity

Ordinal content validity replaces the traditional binary (yes/no) expert relevance judgment with a graded, Likert-type rating scale, allowing richer expert opinion to be captured when evaluating whether scale items adequately represent the intended construct domain.

2 surse2003
psychometrics

Ordinal IRT

Ordinal item response theory (ordinal IRT) comprises a family of probabilistic models — most notably the Graded Response Model and the Partial Credit Model — that relate a respondent's standing on a latent trait to the probability of choosing each ordered response category on a polytomous item. It extends classical IRT

2 surse1969
health education

PIS

The PIS is a self-report questionnaire measuring healthcare students' sense of professional identity, belonging, and commitment to their chosen discipline. Developed by Adams and colleagues in 2006, the PIS assesses the degree to which students have internalized professional roles, values, behaviors, and career commitm

2 surse2006
psychometrics

Polytomous DIF

Polytomous differential item functioning detects whether a test or survey item with more than two ordered response categories (e.g., Likert-type scales, partial-credit items) functions differently across groups such as gender, ethnicity, or language background, after controlling for the latent trait being measured. It

2 surse1990
psychometrics

Polytomous item analysis

Polytomous item analysis examines the psychometric behavior of items that have more than two ordered response categories — such as Likert-type scales or partial-credit tasks. It evaluates each item's difficulty thresholds, discriminating power, and category functioning to determine whether the full response scale is be

2 surse1969
health education

PSCS

The PSCS is a self-report instrument measuring healthcare students' and professionals' self-perceived competence in patient safety practices, safety awareness, and safety culture engagement. Developed by Lachman and informed by James Reason's theoretical framework of human error and systems thinking, the PSCS evaluates

2 surse2012
health education

RIPLS

The RIPLS is a 19-item self-report questionnaire designed to measure healthcare students' attitudes and readiness toward interprofessional learning and collaboration. Developed by Parsell and Bligh in 1999, it assesses three core dimensions of interprofessional readiness: teamwork and collaboration, professional identi

1 sursă1999
health education

RPQ

The RPQ is a self-report instrument measuring the degree to which healthcare students and professionals engage in reflective practice—the deliberate examination of their clinical experiences, decisions, and actions to extract learning and improve future practice. Developed by Sobral and refined by Saarikoski and collea

2 surse2000
health education

SCPS

The SCPS is a self-report questionnaire measuring students' overall satisfaction with their clinical placement experience, including satisfaction with the learning environment, educator support, clinical opportunities, and facility resources. Originally developed by Papastavrou and colleagues in Cyprus (2007–2010), the

2 surse2007