ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelinePublic bureaucracy and delegation studies

Principal-Agent Analysis in the Public Sector

Principal-agent analysis in the public sector applies agency theory to the chains of delegation that run through government — from voters to legislators, legislators to executives, and executives to bureaucracies. Terry Moe's 1984 article The New Economics of Organization brought this institutional-economics lens into the study of public bureaucracy, asking how political principals can control agents who have their own interests and superior information. The method identifies the principal and agent, specifies how their goals diverge, characterises the information asymmetry between them, and examines the control mechanisms principals use to limit agency losses. Its purpose is to explain bureaucratic behaviour and the design of oversight as the predictable result of delegation under conflicting incentives.

Openen in MethodMindBinnenkortToepassen, vergelijken, advies krijgen
Tools & bronnen
Dia's downloaden
Leren & verkennen
VideoBinnenkort

Lees de volledige methode

Alleen voor leden

Log in met een gratis account om dit onderdeel te lezen.

Inloggen

Methodenkaart

De omgeving van verwante methoden — selecteer een knooppunt om te verkennen.

Bronnen

  1. Moe, T. M. (1984). The New Economics of Organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28(4), 739–777. DOI: 10.2307/2110997

Deze pagina citeren

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Principal-Agent Analysis of Public-Sector Delegation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/nl/public-administration/principal-agent-analysis-public

Welke methode?

Plaats deze methode naast haar naaste verwanten en lees ze naast elkaar — de bibliotheek legt de boeken op tafel; de keuze is aan u.

Naast elkaar vergelijken

Geciteerd door

ScholarGatePrincipal-Agent Analysis in the Public Sector (Principal-Agent Analysis of Public-Sector Delegation). Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-24 via https://scholargate.app/nl/public-administration/principal-agent-analysis-public · Gegevensset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026